Rollins College Recycling Proposal
Rollins College Recycling Proposal
In the past decade, recycling has become a way of life across the United States. Small businesses, large corporations, and individuals alike have accepted recycling as their responsibility. Rollins College, too, has begun efforts to recycle. We currently have a very simple and convenient program available to members of the community. Nevertheless, we have only taken the first steps toward utilizing the potential of this program. The climate at Rollins is, and has been for some time, extremely favorable for the enhancement and reintroduction of the existing campus recycling program. Action is long past due. It is time to clean the recycling slate and begin to foster an "ethic of recycling" that will permeate the campus and restore faith in Rollins sense of environmental responsibility. It is the purpose of this proposal to achieve formal recognition from the Rollins College administration of the existence of the Rollins College Recycling Task Force. This Task Force will have the authority to institute an official campus recycling policy that is in the best interest of the Rollins community. It is the desire of the persons submitting this proposal to obtain administrative participation, feedback, and support concerning the efforts of the Recycling Task Force. Therefore, the details and suggested improvements to the existing recycling program are discussed at length within this proposal and conclusions are drawn as to the necessary course of action for implementing a formal recycling policy and an effective recycling program on the Rollins College campus.While we acknowledge recycling as the immediate goal, the ultimate objective is to apply the 3 R's to the Rollins community: reduction, reuse, and recycling. These principles are listed in order of importance, with recycling being the last resort, but the first step to instituting future policies of reuse and reduction. Ultimately, we will strive to achieve the fulfillment of the 3 R's.
A group of students, faculty, and staff have met weekly during the months of March and April to pinpoint reasons for the failure of the existing recycling program and to develop suggestions for implementation of a more consistent and effective system. From these meetings, the unofficial Recycling Task Force has emerged. What this Task Force has determined is that an effective recycling program is well within reach of the college at relatively small expense, both in human and financial resources. A program already exists with the potential to be extremely successful. However, consistent and continual education is a necessary supplement to the existing system. Without this reinforcement, any opportunity for an effective recycling program is disabled. Before suggestions for renovation of the recycling program can be discussed, however, it is necessary to outline the existing recycling program and examine the reasons for its breakdown.
Currently, blue recycle bins are stationed at various locations across campus. These bins contain white bags in which community members can throw away any recyclable material. When Facilities Management collects the bins, they check the contents for contamination. (Contamination includes any un-recyclable or organic material, such as food and drink.) If the bin is contaminated, the white bag is placed inside a black bag to be thrown out with the rest of the regular waste. If it is not contaminated, it remains in the white bag and is also placed with the rest of the garbage for pick-up. When the garbage is picked up, it is taken behind McKean Hall where there is a dumpster for regular trash (the black bags) and a green recycle bin 'in which the white bags are placed. Finally, once a week, Jennings Environmental Services, Inc. empties the bin and takes the contents to be recycled. This program is extremely convenient, since recyclable material does not have to be separated.
The current system has failed to be effective, however, for a number of reasons. First, and perhaps most importantly, there has been little effort made to educate the Rollins community as to which items can and cannot be placed in recycle bins. In a recent recycling survey administered to all students, faculty, and staff, many respondents questioned whether Rollins even has a recycling program, much less whether the program is effective or not. (see Addendum #4) This survey reveals the underlying confusion and lack of education about recycling.
Fines imposed by Jennings Environmental Services, Inc. present another problem. These fines, which can total as much as $600, are a result of contamination in the Jennings recycle bin. The potential for fines represents a significant barrier to the effectiveness of the current recycling program. It is expected that fines for contamination will be absorbed by the budget of Facilities Management, yet the current budget has little room for these potential penalties. The looming threat of fines hinders Facilities Management's ability to effectively implement the existing recycling program. It should be noted, however, that Rollins has yet to be fined by Jennings for contamination.
The final difficulty with the existing system is in Facilities Management's response to problems with bin contamination. While some of the recycle bins have been pulled from buildings altogether, many recycle bins now serve essentially as trash bins. White bags have been replaced with less expensive black bags, signifying that the contents of these bins are not being recycled. As a result, many students, faculty, and staff have lost faith in the current recycling program. Members of the community do not believe that the college is recycling, and in most cases, it is not. The misleading use of recycle bins due to repeated instances of contamination has caused a loss of credibility for the existing recycling program.
The persons submitting this proposal hold that contamination of campus
recycle bins can be combated with a strong educational program that we
are willing to design and implement. In order to undertake such a task,
however, we request formal recognition of the Rollins College Recycling
Task Force. This Task Force will create, implement, and develop the new
recyc1ing program and policy over the summer of 1998. A fist of duties
has been compiled that, upon completion, will prepare the program for its
introduction to all students, faculty, and staff at the start of the '98
- '99 academic year. (see in Addendum # 1)
'Me primary responsibilities of the Task Force are to set the new recycling
program on its feet and to monitor the program until an official entity
is designated that will subsequently oversee the recycling policy on campus.
The term "entity" is used intentionally to provide latitude for additional
suggestions from college representatives, as well as to encompass a number
of possibilities that have been considered. Several options for this entity
are listed in Addendum #3.
Based on the needs of the existing community and the resources available at the present time, we feel that the following entity option is the most viable. Therefore, the recommended course of action by the individuals submitting this proposal is the creation of a formal college committee -the Rollins College Environmental Action Committee - that will oversee the recycling policy on campus. To assess and respond to a variety of campus needs, it is recommended that this committee consist of administration, faculty, staff, and students. After considerable research on this topic, it is suggested that the responsibilities of this committee resemble those of a similar committee instituted at the University of Virginia (see Addendum #5). Obviously, due to the size discrepancy between U.Va and Rollins, the recycling network created on this campus will be scaled down to meet the needs of the Rollins community. However, we believe that the UVA example provides a strong foundation for the Rollins College Environmental Action Committee.
Our recommendations for representatives on this committee are as follows:
1) A chairperson responsible for assembling, organizing, and chairing Rollins College Environmental Action Committee meetings.
2) An individual, who will serve as a liaison to Human Resources and will be responsible for obtaining a monthly list of new employees. (Note: perhaps the new Banner System will enhance this process.) This list will target new faculty and staff for collective education without having to subject departments to a redundant training process.
3) A Facilities Management liaison responsible for implementing and educating Facilities Management staff on changes in recycling policy. This liaison will also be responsible for monitoring training of new Facilities Management employees, particularly staff responsible for collection of recycling bins. It is suggested that a staff member from Facilities Management involved in the collection process be included, as well.
4) A liaison to Residential Life responsible for corresponding with resident assistants who will monitor the quality of the recycling program in the residence halls.
5) Two paid student assistants. The roles of student assistants are described below. These students must display commitment to promoting environmental wellbeing on campus.
6) One (unpaid) student representative, such as an SGA delegate, the president of Eco Rollins, or another designated student leader.
7) A representative from Marriott, Business Services, and/or the Cornell Campus Center and other departments as deemed necessary. Additional or alternate recommendations for seats on this committee are open for future discussion and determination.
As mentioned above, it is recommended that two students receive stipends for their work in the implementation and upkeep of the new recycling program. Unlike many other student commitments, such as student government or participation in a student organization, the responsibilities required of the Student Recycling Assistants are of a specific task nature.
Student Recycling Assistants Responsibilities include, but are not limited to, the following:
1) Maintain recycling statistics. In order to monitor bin contamination, on a weekly basis students will collect bin contamination cards completed by Facilities Management staff. They will then compile statistics on bin contamination for presentation at Environmental Action Committee meetings, as well as make suggestions for necessary improvements and educational requirements. The Recycling Task Force will determine other methods for statistical collection during the summer of '98.
2) Maintain a recycling web page that will be created during the summer of '98. The web page will be a valuable resource for reaching students, faculty, and staff. Using electronic methods such as Fox-e and Fox Flash, the recycling program can be enhanced by providing an outlet for immediate dispersal of information to the campus.
3) Perform public relations responsibilities, such as submitting articles to the Sandspur, the Grapevine, and other campus publications that will reach members of the Rollins community.
4) Maintain campus communication. Respond to e-mails sent to a new e-mail address --recycie@rollins.edu -- and telephone calls made to a campus recycling hotline (pending approval of these means). (see Addendum #1)
5) Oversee the operations of a Campus Exchange. Through the Exchange, materials such as boxes and box stuffing can be stored and reused when requested by different departments. This will decrease the amount of material disposed of (by recycling or other means), as well as the cost of buying new materials for shipping or other purposes. (see Addendum #8)
6) Communicate with Jennings Environmental Services, Inc. on recycling program concerns. This includes preliminary trips to Jennings to become educated on the total recycling process.
7) Advise a student group (faculty and staff are welcome, too) in planning and implementing programs and education to supplement the responsibilities of the Environmental Action Committee.
It is the belief of the persons submitting this proposal that the paid stipend is necessary for consistent and effective implementation of this program. Currently, a dedicated group of students exists that is willing to take on these responsibilities. Ultimately, however, it is the college that should be responsible for the effectiveness of the recycling program. Dependence on student volunteers on a year-by-year basis is unreliable, especially considering the nature of the tasks required of such a position. By not providing remuneration for student participants, the college would be risking the long-term effectiveness of the recycling program, and any effort to institute a recycling policy would be in vain. With a stipend as compensation, students' efforts will be validated and the college's commitment to the recycling effort will be affirmed.
Additionally, part of the responsibility of the committee will be to determine the necessity of future student stipends for work on the Environmental Action Committee. After the first year, the work of the Student Recycling Assistants will be evaluated, and the committee will reserve the right to determine whether or not future stipends are warranted or the amount of these stipends should be adjusted.
This particular entity option - the Environmental Action Committee - is proposed as a compromise. The original intent of the Recycling Task Force was to suggest that a Recycling Coordinator be hired. Many institutions of higher education have a similar position designated within their organizational structure. However, results of the campus-wide survey revealed a strong contingency of faculty and staff in opposition to the creation of a new position due to current restructuring within the college. (see Addendum #4) While it is recognized that the current climate is not conducive to the creation of a new position, it is recommended that discussion of a new position be considered in the future by the Environmental Action Committee in conjunction with the administration of Rollins College.
To implement an effective recycling program, change must be instituted from the top down. Originally, the persons submitting this proposal were hesitant to request the institution of additional job responsibilities for faculty and staff, especially if those responsibilities would go uncompensated. While we do not want any faculty or staff member to be taxed unjustly by additional job requirements, we believe that, in many cases, additional responsibilities are necessary, just, and easily carried out. Obviously, the requirements of the majority of faculty and staff will be attendance at a departmental training session on recycling and integration of this training into daily operations. However, there are some positions on campus that warrant recycling as part of their job description. For example, attendance by a representative of Facilities Management on the Rollins College Environmental Action Committee should not be arbitrary, but rather a requirement under a specific position description.
In connection with the idea of top down reinforcement, the persons submitting this proposal request that the president of Rollins College formally proclaim support of the campus recycling effort to the members of the Rollins community. This formal recognition is essential to creating an ethic of recycling that will permeate all aspects of the Rollins community. It is believed that individuals in all segments of the community will be more responsive to the recycling program if formal administrative support is offered. A course of action that will publicly endorse this policy is the generation of a letter of support to be distributed to students, faculty, and staff at the college.
To maintain long-term consistency of the recycling program, all members of the Rollins community must be educated about the new recycling policy. The educational effort must meet the needs of an ever-changing student body, by incorporating the ethic of recycling into the existing college structure. Ken Posner, the Associate Dean and Director of Residential Life has agreed to incorporate recycling education into the Residential Life training process. At their first floor/hall meeting, resident assistants and house managers will explain the recycling policy to all residential students. They will then serve as contacts between on-campus students and the Environmental Action Committee. To ensure that off campus students receive information about the recycling program as well, recycling brochures will be distributed at registration. These brochures will outline the recycling policy and will be a reference for the community as a whole. In the future, a similar document will be included in the binder sent to new students prior to their arrival at the college. These provide an example of the extensive educational programs that will be instituted to reinforce the goals of the Environmental Action Committee.
Once the suggested program is actualized, improvements to this program will be made in support of the philosophy delineated by the 3 R's. Potential changes that incorporate the concept of reuse and reduction are the replacement of current white paper with recycled paper in campus departments and computer labs and the distribution and endorsement of double-sided, single spaced documents across campus. Current faculty members, such as Les Lloyd, the Vice President of Information Technology, have conveyed their support for such programs. It will be the responsibility of the committee to research and determine various changes to the recycling policy that fulfill the comprehensive nature of reuse, reduce, recycle.
The following is a list of requested resources that will supplement the institution of the proposed program. Many of these costs can be absorbed into existing departmental and organizational budgets. A goal of the program is to disperse the request for resources to various departments, thus promoting campus-wide responsibility for recycling.
1) Printing and material costs for the recycling policy brochure.
The envisioned brochure is a single sheet of paper folded and printed on
both sides. Printing can be done on campus, utilizing the campus publishing
center. Enough copies need to be made for distribution to every member
of the Rollins College community. Additional copies will be necessary for
new staff and students upon their arrival at the college.
2) As mentioned previously, stipends for two Student Recycling
Representatives.
3) Buffer fund. The creation of a buffer fund from which fines
for contamination can be absorbed is proposed to provide latitude in Facilities
Management's budget. As previously mentioned, the college has not yet been
fined for contamination. Although fines for contamination will occur very
infrequently, it is important to budget for this possibility, especially
at the start of this program.
4) Exchange storage space. Upon the creation of a Campus Exchange,
storage space must be designated for materials collected. Use of campus
transportation (such as a truck or golf cart) and gas fees incurred in
conjunction with picking up and distributing materials for the Exchange
present a potential cost.
5) Copying privileges. For distribution of information, a small
amount of copying may be necessary in addition to the brochure printing
cost. Copies could include publicity for campus programming, informational
handouts, surveys, and other material as needed.
6) Signs to be placed above recycle bins. These signs will provide
visual reinforcement of the education provided at the beginning of the
year by delineating what can and can not be recycled. Lamination of signs
to prevent against wear and damage is recommended.
7) Books and other resource materials to assist in the development
of the recycling program.
8) Phone and/or voice mail to be used as a recycling hotline.
9) Programming funds. In order to reinforce the recycling program
with education, funds will be necessary for campus programming. Possible
sources for these funds are the Residence Hall Association and various
other student organizations.
10) Cost of new bins. Rich Seftner from Facilities Management
has verbally agreed that the Facilities Management budget will accommodate
the cost of new recycle bins. Some of this cost will be covered from the
return of existing bins. The persons submitting this proposal have determined
that the similarity in appearance of blue recycling bins and campus trash
receptacles is detrimental to the existing program.
11) Budgetary margin for additional innovations and supplies
to be determined over the surnmer of 1998.
In order to maintain the consistency of the recycling program, we believe that the above resource requests must be filled.
In conclusion, it is important to fully understand the benefits of developing a more effective recycling policy and program on the Rollins College campus. With the institution of this proposal we can begin to maximize the human and economic resources already expended on the presently inefficient recycling program. The possibility exists that the diversion of recyclable material into campus recycling bins will ultimately reduce the amount of campus waste, and subsequently, the cost of garbage collection.
Another supporting factor is the existence of a campus climate favorable for recycling. As the recent survey suggests, members of the Rollins community support the institution of this program. At the present time, a motivated group of students, faculty, and staff exists that is willing to spend the time and effort required to implement a more effective program. If the recycling dilemina is not solved to the satisfaction of the Rollins community, the issue of recycling will continue to persist. Recycling is an inevitability that the college will have to face at some point in the near future, It makes sense to take advantage of the existing climate to solve this pressing problem while motivation from students, faculty, and staff is high.
Another positive outcome of adopting a recycling policy is the message conveyed to the surrounding community concerning Rollins' sense of environmental responsibility. As an educational institution, it is important that the college serve as a leader in the community.
Establishing consistency between the practice and the teachings of Rollins College will serve to foster a sense of community on campus. This year's course catalog proudly displays the slogan, "Educating students for active citizenship in a global society." Participation in recycling is now a necessary foundation for responsible citizenship almost anywhere in the world. Therefore, recycling provides the basic opportunity to actively participate in environmental action shared on a global level.
This document reflects the genuine desire of the persons submitting
this proposal to contribute to the betterment of the campus where they
live, learn, and work. We submit this with the belief that Rollins College
is a responsible institution that will seriously consider the needs and
wants of its community. We thank you for taking the time to review this
proposal and hope that Rollins College wholeheartedly embraces the reality
of an effective recycling program.
ADDENDUM #1 RECYCLING TASK FORCE AGENDA
Items to be Completed During the Summer of '98:
Pull signs off bins in the Student Center to signify to students, faculty, and staff that change is in progress; work with Facilities Management to find a temporary happy medium for existing recycling bins. Work with the administration to setup summer goals, authority, and responsibility of the task force over the summer.
Official Institution Of Recycling Task Force
Question 1
Do you believe that Rollins'
current recycling program is effective?
YES NO UNDECIDED
Faculty/Staff
16 175 11
Students
3
220 7
Total
19 395 18
Total %
4% 91% 4%
Question 2
Would you support the designation of a
new campus position-Recycling Coordinator-
to oversee recycling policy on campus?
YES NO UNDECIDED
Faculty/Staff
104 80 18
Students
188 31 11
Total
292 111 29
Total % 68% 26% 7%
Question 3
If recycling facilities were accessible to
you on campus, would you recycle?
YES NO UNDECIDED
Faculty/Staff
192
3 7
Students
224 2 4
Total
416 5 11
Total %
96% 1% 3%
Surveys Administered:
Faculty/Staff 541
Students 1450
Total 1991
Surveys returned:
Faculty/Staff
202 37%
Students
230 16%
Total
432 22%
WHEREAS, environmental issues are of great concern to the members of the Rollins cornmunity as a whole,
WHEREAS, the current recycling program at Rollins College is not being used to its Mest potential,
WHEREAS, there is now a task force comprised of students and faculty members that have committed a large amount of time to improving the recycling program; therefore,
BE IT RESOLVED BY THIS S.G.A. SENATE HERE ASSEMBLED THAT
Effective immediately, the Recycling Task Force (which may choose to
take on another name) be officially recognized by the college, and supported
financially in its endeavors to improve the effectiveness of the recycling
program.
Student Wage Costs
Hourly Wage # Weeks Max Hours
# Students Total
Summer (June 22 - August 30)
$ 7.00
10
20
2 $ 2,800.00
98 -'99 Academic Year
$ 7.00
32
10
2 4,480.00
Total Student Wage Costs** $ 7,280.00
Printing Costs
Policy brochure $ 400.00
Tracking cards 175.00
Standard recycling bin signs 310.00
Other signs 100.00
Newsletters/flyers/surveys 400.00
Total Printing Costs
$1,385.00
Development Costs
New recycling bins** $5,830.00
Development resources** 50.00
Total Development Costs $5,880.00
Programming Costs
Supplemental educational programming**
$ 200.00
Total Programming Costs
$ 200.00
Total Costs $14,745.00
Student Wage Costs $7,280.00
Student positions are modeled after the Rollins College Web Team. Web
Team members are individually responsible for working on projects on a
need basis. Seven dollars an hour comprises the average wage for management-oriented
student positions.
Printing Costs $1,395.00
Policy brochures and signs are for educational purposes; newsletters
andflyers are for promotional purposes; and surveys and tracking cards
monitor program effectiveness. Costs are based on the prices of the Rollins
College Publishing Center.
Development Costs $5,880.00
The cost of recycling bins includes 100 large bins for dorms ($3000),
30 for outdoors ($1965), and 100 small units for academic buildings ($865)
for a total of $5830.00. Development resources include books and other
research materials ($50).
Programming Costs $200.00
These funds will supplement community-building seminars, activities,
and educational programs that focus on reusing, reducing, and recycling
materials.